
As the Favre saga continues, most of the arguments have distilled down into, "Who can win more games this year, Favre or Rogers?"
Personally, I take it one more step. The Packers won a lot of games last year, but fell one short. I ask, "Who can win a Super Bowl for the Packers, Favre or Rogers?"
The answer is neither Favre or Rogers will take the Pack to the Super Bowl this year, but Rogers at least has a chance to take the Packers next year.
I appreciate everything Favre has done for the Packers, but I also keep two important points in mind. When the Packers were playing the wildcard team, in Lambeau, in January, in the cold, they lost. That is unacceptable. What is worse, Favre look cold, timid, and broken. He didn't have as bad of a game as I probably remember (his QB rating was around 70), but he did not play well enough to win. To be put in the same breath as Aikman, Brady, Bradshaw, and Starr, Favre needed to pull that game out. He needed to throw the game winning touchdown, no the game losing interception.
That lack of clutch playing when it counts is the second thing to keep in mind. As great as Favre looks snatching victory from defeat against the Chiefs or teams like that during the regular season, he has rarley done it when it matters. Favre has only won one Super Bowl, and it is really not because of a lack of a supporting cast. It is "Favre being Favre" in the playoffs, or coming out too amped, or throwing too many interceptions. Favre has a lot of records, but he does not have a lot of rings.
I don't know if Rogers can win a Super Bowl, but I do know that Favre cannot.